Sur 0–100 km/h, Han EV 200kW 2WD gagne (7,76 s vs 8,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Han EV 200kW 2WD | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s−0,36 s | 8,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s−0,40 s | 16,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s−2,41 s | 30,62 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h+30 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,16 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Han EV 200kW 2WD | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,20 s | 2,07 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,68 s | 3,46 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,92 s | 5,85 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 8,12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,11 s | 11,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,24 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 16,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s | 30,62 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Han EV 200kW 2WD | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Han EV 200kW 2WD hits 100 km/h in 7.76 s versus 8.12 s for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. Despite the faster sprint time, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD is doing 123 km/h against 117 km/h for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. The gap is 0.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Han EV 200kW 2WD crosses the line in 15.74 s versus 16.13 s. The 0.39 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 172 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD finishes in 28.20 s versus 30.62 s, with a 2.41 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Han EV 200kW 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.76 kg/hp vs 10.16 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.23 seconds. The 0.36 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Han EV 200kW 2WD gagne (7,76 s vs 8,12 s).
Han EV 200kW 2WD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,76 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Han EV 200kW 2WD : 272 hp, ratio 7,76 kg/hp. 5 E-Tech Electric 150 : 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp.
Han EV 200kW 2WD : 180 km/h. 5 E-Tech Electric 150 : 150 km/h.