Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 10,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Seal 313 2WD | Jazz e:HEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s−4,04 s | 10,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s−3,13 s | 17,34 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s−5,55 s | 31,87 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h+5 km/h | 175 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,35 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,51 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Seal 313 2WD | Jazz e:HEV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,74 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,90 s | 3,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 6,98 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,00 s | 10,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,72 s | 14,08 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,20 s | 31,01 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s | 17,34 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,32 s | 31,87 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 175 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 118 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 220 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 10.04 s for the Jazz e:HEV. The instant torque of 360 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Seal 313 2WD leads by 4.04 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 107 km/h for the Jazz e:HEV. The gap is 1.92 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 17.34 s. The 3.13 s gap represents roughly 110 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Seal 313 2WD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 146 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Seal 313 2WD finishes in 26.31 s versus 31.87 s, with a 5.56 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 175 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 313 2WD is capped at 180 km/h, the Jazz e:HEV at 175 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.76 seconds. The 4.04 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD wins (6,00 s vs 10,04 s).
Seal 313 2WD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 313 2WD: 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp. Jazz e:HEV: 118 hp, ratio 10,51 kg/hp.
Seal 313 2WD: 180 km/h. Jazz e:HEV: 175 km/h.