Over 0–100 km/h, 320e G20 wins (7,46 s vs 8,36 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 9 E-Tense 250 | 320e G20 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 7.46 s | 0.90 s · 320e G20 |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 15.44 s | 0.78 s · 320e G20 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 28.77 s | 0.20 s · 9 E-Tense 250 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 215 km/h | 20 km/h · 9 E-Tense 250 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.51 kg/hp | 8.65 kg/hp | better ratio · 9 E-Tense 250 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 9 E-Tense 250 | 320e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.40 s | 1.31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4.01 s | 2.37 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6.47 s | 4.96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 7.46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.88 s | 10.74 s · tight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.12 s | 20.97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31.70 s | 46.63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 15.44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 28.77 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 215 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the 320e hits 100 km/h in 7.46 s versus 8.36 s for the 9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the 320e leads by 0.90 s and sits roughly 32 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 320e is doing 115 km/h against 121 km/h for the 9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.11 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the 320e crosses the line in 15.43 s versus 16.22 s. The 0.78 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The 320e maxes out at 215 km/h while the 9 E-Tense 250 keeps accelerating towards 235 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.45 s.
Around 875 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the 9 E-Tense 250 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 20 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the 9 E-Tense 250 finishes in 28.57 s versus 28.77 s. The 0.20 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 220 km/h, the 320e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.51 kg/hp vs 8.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 0.90 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320e G20 wins (7,46 s vs 8,36 s).
9 E-Tense 250 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).
9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. 320e G20: 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp.
9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h. 320e G20: 215 km/h.