Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 wins (6,29 s vs 6,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Explorer EcoBoost 300 | Macan 95B.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,71 s | 6,29 s+0,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,93 s | 14,56 s+0,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,10 s | 26,84 s+0,26 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 220 km/h | 229 km/h−9 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,70 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,59 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Explorer EcoBoost 300 | Macan 95B.2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,82 s | 1,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,04 s | 2,34 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,96 s | 4,41 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,71 s | 6,29 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,99 s | 8,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,83 s | 15,99 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,71 s | 30,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,93 s | 14,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,10 s | 26,84 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 229 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 043 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 10-speed torque-converter automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 859 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.29 s versus 6.71 s for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. At this point, the Macan leads by 0.42 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 125 km/h against 127 km/h for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The gap is 0.44 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 14.92 s. The 0.36 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Explorer EcoBoost 300 maxes out at 220 km/h while the Macan keeps accelerating towards 229 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.30 s.
At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.84 s versus 27.09 s, with just 0.25 s to spare. The Explorer EcoBoost 300 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Explorer EcoBoost 300 is capped at 220 km/h, the Macan at 229 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.70 kg/hp vs 7.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.35 seconds. The 0.42 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 wins (6,29 s vs 6,71 s).
Explorer EcoBoost 300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Explorer EcoBoost 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,70 kg/hp. Macan 95B.2: 245 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp.
Explorer EcoBoost 300: 220 km/h. Macan 95B.2: 229 km/h.