Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 4,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE SVR | P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 4,21 s+0,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s−0,25 s | 12,55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s−3,19 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+115 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,81 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE SVR | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,11 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 1,85 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 3,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 4,21 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 5,64 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,68 s | 9,67 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,35 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 024 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 4.35 s for the F-PACE SVR. The instant torque of 655 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the P7 leads by 0.13 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 154 km/h for the F-PACE SVR. The gap is 0.06 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-PACE SVR crosses the line in 12.30 s versus 12.54 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 12 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the F-PACE SVR continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE SVR finishes in 22.05 s versus 25.24 s, with a 3.19 s lead.
On paper, the F-PACE SVR combines 550 hp, 680 Nm and 2,024 kg - a clear theoretical edge over the P7. Yet the P7 launches quicker. At standstill, both motors deliver peak torque from 0 rpm: the decisive factor is no longer raw power, but available grip. If the P7 has a better traction coefficient (tyres, weight distribution, traction control calibration), it puts down more force despite inferior specs - exactly what the simulation reflects, calibrated on manufacturer 0-100 km/h times.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-PACE SVR is capped at 285 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.49 seconds. The 0.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 4,35 s).
F-PACE SVR goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-PACE SVR: 550 hp, ratio 3,68 kg/hp. P7: 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp.
F-PACE SVR: 285 km/h. P7: 170 km/h.