Over 0–100 km/h, 5 E-Tech Electric 150 wins (8,12 s vs 13,48 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
13.48 s
| Measure | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | Spring Electric 65 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.12 s | 13.48 s | 5.36 s · 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
| 400 m standing start | 16.14 s | 19.46 s | 3.32 s · 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30.62 s | 36.80 s | 6.18 s · 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 150 km/h | 125 km/h | 25 km/h · 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10.16 kg/hp | 15.14 kg/hp | better ratio · 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | Spring Electric 65 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.07 s | 3.12 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.46 s | 5.23 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.85 s | 9.27 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.12 s | 13.48 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11.18 s | 19.85 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16.14 s | 19.46 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30.62 s | 36.80 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 125 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 65 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor 48 kW |
| Torque | 113 Nm | |
| Weight | 984 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 hits 100 km/h in 8.12 s versus 13.48 s for the Spring Electric 65. At this point, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 leads by 5.36 s and sits roughly 39 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 is doing 117 km/h against 97 km/h for the Spring Electric 65. The gap is 2.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 crosses the line in 16.13 s versus 19.46 s. The 3.32 s gap represents roughly 106 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 150 km/h versus 125 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 finishes in 30.62 s versus 36.79 s, with a 6.18 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 is capped at 150 km/h, the Spring Electric 65 at 125 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.16 kg/hp vs 15.14 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 5 E-Tech Electric 150 wins (8,12 s vs 13,48 s).
5 E-Tech Electric 150 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp. Spring Electric 65: 65 hp, ratio 15,14 kg/hp.
5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 km/h. Spring Electric 65: 125 km/h.