Over 0–100 km/h, Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 and 5 E-Tech Electric 150 are neck and neck (8,12 s vs 8,18 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,18 s | 8,12 s+0,06 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,12 s−0,02 s | 16,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,80 s−0,82 s | 30,62 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 211 km/h+61 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,45 kg/hp | 10,16 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,90 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,17 s | 3,46 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,71 s | 5,85 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,18 s | 8,12 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,49 s | 11,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 23,49 s | - |
| 0–200 km/h | 58,58 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16,12 s | 16,14 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,80 s | 30,62 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 777 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 hits 100 km/h in 8.12 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. The 0.06 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is doing 115 km/h against 117 km/h for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 crosses the line in 16.11 s versus 16.13 s. The 0.02 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 154 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 finishes in 29.80 s versus 30.62 s, with a 0.82 s lead.
Electronically capped at 150 km/h, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.45 kg/hp vs 10.16 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 0.06 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 and 5 E-Tech Electric 150 are neck and neck (8,12 s vs 8,18 s, no significant gap).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,18 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp.
Scenic E-Tech Electric 170: 211 km/h. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 km/h.