Sur 0–100 km/h, Captur TCe 130 EDC gagne (9,74 s vs 11,20 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Captur TCe 130 EDC | HR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 9,74 s−1,46 s | 11,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,32 s−0,95 s | 18,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,22 s−1,59 s | 32,81 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 188 km/h | 188 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,57 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,75 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Captur TCe 130 EDC | HR-V |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,62 s | 2,85 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,39 s | 4,77 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 7,14 s | 8,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 9,74 s | 11,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 13,23 s | 15,52 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 25,81 s | 31,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,32 s | 18,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,22 s | 32,81 s |
| Top speed | 188 km/h | 188 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 131 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 254 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch EDC |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 120 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 290 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Captur TCe 130 EDC hits 100 km/h in 9.74 s versus 11.20 s for the HR-V. At this point, the Captur TCe 130 EDC leads by 1.46 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Captur TCe 130 EDC is doing 111 km/h against 105 km/h for the HR-V. The gap is 0.62 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Captur TCe 130 EDC crosses the line in 17.32 s versus 18.27 s. The 0.95 s gap represents roughly 34 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Captur TCe 130 EDC continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 152 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Captur TCe 130 EDC finishes in 31.21 s versus 32.81 s, with a 1.60 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (188 vs 188 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Captur TCe 130 EDC and the HR-V are governed to 188 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.57 kg/hp vs 10.75 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.22 seconds. The 1.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Captur TCe 130 EDC gagne (9,74 s vs 11,20 s).
Captur TCe 130 EDC passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 9,74 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Captur TCe 130 EDC : 131 hp, ratio 9,57 kg/hp. HR-V : 120 hp, ratio 10,75 kg/hp.
Captur TCe 130 EDC : 188 km/h. HR-V : 188 km/h.