Renault Captur TCe 130 EDC
131 hp, 9,7 s 0-100 : among the 12 B-SUV 2018–2022, the Captur TCe 130 EDC ranks 5th of 12 in Combined consumption, 4th of 10 in Tank range, 5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 131 hp
- 240 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9.7 s
- VMax 188 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 48 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,332 cm³
- Power
- 131 hp
- Couple
- 240 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 48 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9,7 s
- VMax
- 188 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,227 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,639 mm
- Width
- 1,797 mm
- Height
- 1,577 mm
- Kerb weight
- 1,254 kg
- Cd
- 0.32
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 B-SUV, the Captur TCe 130 EDC ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 4th of 10 in Tank range (857 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (1st with 977 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (5th of 12 in Combined consumption)
The Captur TCe 130 EDC consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 857 km (4th of 10 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Captur TCe 130 EDC covers 857 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 977 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Captur TCe 130 EDC stands against B-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Renault Captur range
Other versions
Popular duels involving the Captur TCe 130 EDC
Continue with the Renault Captur TCe 130 EDC
The same car, from other angles.
Renault Captur TCe 130 EDC: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Captur TCe 130 EDC rank in its segment?
Among the 12 B-SUV 2018–2022, the Captur TCe 130 EDC ranks 5th of 12 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125), 4th of 10 in Tank range (857 km, behind the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125), 5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s, behind the Ford Puma ST 200).
What is the range of the Captur TCe 130 EDC?
857 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 4th of 10 in Tank range.
How much does the Captur TCe 130 EDC cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 instead?
The Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Captur TCe 130 EDC vs Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.