Sur 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range gagne (7,41 s vs 8,18 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Atto 3 Extended Range | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,41 s−0,77 s | 8,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,57 s−0,55 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,20 s−0,60 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 211 km/h−51 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,58 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Atto 3 Extended Range | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,96 s | 1,90 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,27 s | 3,17 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,43 s | 5,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,41 s | 8,18 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,03 s | 11,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,03 s | 23,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 58,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,57 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,20 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 211 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 777 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Atto 3 Extended Range hits 100 km/h in 7.41 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. At this point, the Atto 3 Extended Range leads by 0.77 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range is doing 121 km/h against 115 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. The gap is 0.23 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Atto 3 Extended Range crosses the line in 15.57 s versus 16.11 s. The 0.55 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range finishes in 29.19 s versus 29.80 s, with a 0.61 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (211 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 160 km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.58 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 0.77 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range gagne (7,41 s vs 8,18 s).
Atto 3 Extended Range passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,41 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Atto 3 Extended Range : 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
Atto 3 Extended Range : 160 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 211 km/h.