Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AScenicBEVvsBX1Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsScenic · X1

Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs BMW X1 xDrive20i F48: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2024 vs 2019 · Methodology
RenaultBEV

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

218 hp · 300 Nm · 1,989 kg · 2024

VS
BMWPetrolFaster

X1 xDrive20i F48

192 hp · 280 Nm · 1,570 kg · 2019

Result · 0–100 km/h

ARenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

8.05 s

Gap0.27 sin favour of X1 xDrive20i
BBMW X1 xDrive20i F48

7.78 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureScenic E-Tech Electric 220X1 xDrive20i F48Gap
0–100 km/h8.05 s7.78 s0.27 s · X1 xDrive20i F48
400 m standing start16.06 s15.68 s0.38 s · X1 xDrive20i F48
1,000 m standing start28.98 s28.72 s0.26 s · X1 xDrive20i F48
Top speed (electronically limited)233 km/h221 km/h12 km/h · Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
Power-to-weight ratio9.12 kg/hp8.18 kg/hpbetter ratio · X1 xDrive20i F48

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

RenaultBEVScenic E-Tech Electric 220
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPetrolX1 xDrive20i F48
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageScenic E-Tech Electric 220X1 xDrive20i F48
0–30 km/h2.24 s1.58 s
0–50 km/h3.75 s2.80 s
0–80 km/h6.07 s5.40 s
0–100 km/h8.05 s7.78 s
0–120 km/h10.66 s10.86 s
0–160 km/h19.80 s20.00 s
0–200 km/h38.38 s40.38 s
400 m standing start16.06 s15.68 s
1,000 m standing start28.98 s28.72 s
Top speed233 km/h221 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Renault

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

9,12kg/hpcompensated by −419 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power218 hpPending
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 989 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed
BMW

X1 xDrive20i F48

8,18kg/hpratio better by 0,95 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power192 hp4 cyl
Torque280 Nm
Weight1 570 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the X1 xDrive20i hits 100 km/h in 7.78 s versus 8.05 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. Despite lacking instant torque, 192 hp of power compensates. At this point, the X1 xDrive20i leads by 0.27 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the X1 xDrive20i is doing 116 km/h against 120 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap is 0.55 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the X1 xDrive20i crosses the line in 15.67 s versus 16.06 s. The 0.39 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The X1 xDrive20i maxes out at 221 km/h while the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 keeps accelerating towards 233 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.32 s.

At 1,000 metres, the X1 xDrive20i finishes in 28.72 s versus 28.98 s, with just 0.26 s to spare. The Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 fails to fully close the launch gap.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The X1 xDrive20i features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Electronically capped at 223 km/h, the X1 xDrive20i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.69 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

RenaultVSBYD

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Atto 3 Extended Range

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X1 xDrive20i

RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

VolvoVSBMW

XC40 B4 vs X1 xDrive20i

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive20i F48 wins (7,78 s vs 8,05 s).

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 218 hp, ratio 9,12 kg/hp. X1 xDrive20i F48: 192 hp, ratio 8,18 kg/hp.

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 233 km/h. X1 xDrive20i F48: 221 km/h.