X1 xDrive20i
192 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 46 C-SUV 2017–2021, the X1 xDrive20i ranks 36th of 46 in Combined consumption, 25th of 43 in Tank range, 20th of 46 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
192hp
280 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.9s
VMax 223 km/h
Cons.
6.7L
/100 km
Tank
61L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X1 xDrive20i
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 192 hp |
| Couple | 280 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | X1 xDrive20i |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,7 L/100km |
| Tank | 61 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,9 s |
| VMax | 223 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,439 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,821 mm |
| Height | 1,598 mm |
| Boot | 505 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,570 kg |
| Cd | 0.28 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 152 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 46 C-SUV, the X1 xDrive20i ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 6.7 L/100 L/100 (36th of 46 in Combined consumption)
The X1 xDrive20i consumes 6.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 910 km (25th of 43 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X1 xDrive20i covers 910 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the X1 xDrive20i stands against C-SUV
Comparison across 46 C-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption
36eout of 46
Tank range
25eout of 43
0–100 km/h
20eout of 46
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q3 Sportback
193 hp · 0-100 7.5 s
E-PACE P200
200 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW
204 hp · 0-100 7.1 s
Q3 SUV
204 hp · 0-100 7.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X1 F48 range
Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F48
Compare
Popular duels involving the X1 xDrive20i
Take the next step
Find a X1 xDrive20i or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW X1 xDrive20i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 46 C-SUV 2017–2021, the X1 xDrive20i ranks 36th of 46 in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 25th of 43 in Tank range (910 km, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 20th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).
910 km on a full tank (6.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 25th of 43 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 xDrive20i vs Bmw X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.