Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro S wins (7,88 s vs 8,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| ID.3 Pro S | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,88 s−0,24 s | 8,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,92 s−0,22 s | 16,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,62 s−1,00 s | 30,62 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h+10 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,46 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,16 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | ID.3 Pro S | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,02 s | 2,07 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,38 s | 3,46 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,70 s | 5,85 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,88 s | 8,12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,75 s | 11,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,40 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,92 s | 16,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,62 s | 30,62 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 930 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ID.3 Pro S hits 100 km/h in 7.88 s versus 8.12 s for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. At this point, the ID.3 Pro S leads by 0.24 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ID.3 Pro S is doing 118 km/h against 117 km/h for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. The gap is 0.12 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.3 Pro S crosses the line in 15.91 s versus 16.13 s. The 0.22 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the ID.3 Pro S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the ID.3 Pro S finishes in 29.62 s versus 30.62 s, with a 1.00 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 150 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the ID.3 Pro S is capped at 160 km/h, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.46 kg/hp vs 10.16 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.23 seconds. The 0.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro S wins (7,88 s vs 8,12 s).
ID.3 Pro S goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,88 seconds (calibrated simulation).
ID.3 Pro S: 204 hp, ratio 9,46 kg/hp. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp.
ID.3 Pro S: 160 km/h. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 km/h.