Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon

Essence hybridecompactGENERATION 2025

184 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 13 compacts hybrid 2023–2027, the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon ranks 9th of 13 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 13 in Tank range, 7th of 13 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
184 hp
330 Nm, dont 30 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.9 s
VMax 228 km/h
Cons.
5.7 L
/100 km
Tank
51 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement
1,499 cm³
Electric power
30 hp
Combined power
184 hp
Couple
330 Nm
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
5.7 L/100 km
Tank
51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
7,9 s
VMax
228 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,723 mm
Wheelbase
2,790 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
1,450 mm
Boot
405 L
Kerb weight
1,770 kg
CO₂ WLTP
130 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 13 compacts hybrid, the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 13 in Tank range (895 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Mercedes CLA 200 Limousine (1st with 5.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Limousine (1st with 895 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.7 L/100 L/100 (9th of 13 in Combined consumption)

The CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon consumes 5.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Mercedes CLA 200 Limousine (5.4 L/100).

Tank range: 895 km (2nd of 13 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon covers 895 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 895 km.

Where the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon stands against compacts hybrid

Comparison across 13 compacts hybrid marketed between 2023–2027.
Combined consumption9e / 13
5.7 L/100
Min 6.4 L/100 · BMW 123 xDriveMax 5.4 L/100 · Mercedes CLA 200 Limousine
Tank range2e / 13
895 km
Min 766 km · BMW 123 xDriveMax 895 km · Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Limousine
0–100 km/h7e / 13
7,9 s
Min 9,9 s · Audi A3 Sportback TFSI S tronic 85 kW MHEVMax 6,3 s · BMW 123 xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Mercedes CLA range

Other versions

Popular duels involving the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon

Continue with the Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon

The same car, from other angles.

Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon rank in its segment?

Among the 13 compacts hybrid 2023–2027, the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon ranks 9th of 13 in Combined consumption (5.7 L/100, behind the Mercedes CLA 200 Limousine), 2nd of 13 in Tank range (895 km, behind the Mercedes CLA 200 4MATIC Limousine), 7th of 13 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the BMW 123 xDrive).

What is the range of the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon?

895 km on a full tank (5.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 13 in Tank range.

How much does the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Mercedes CLA 200 Limousine instead?

The Mercedes CLA 200 Limousine leads in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100 vs 5.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon vs Mercedes CLA 200 Limousine duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.