Among the 11 city cars 2021–2025, the i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT) ranks 5th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT)), 5th of 11 in Tank range (727 km, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT)), 6th of 11 in 0–100 km/h (15.2 s, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT)).
i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT)
67 hp, 15,2 s 0-100 : among the 11 city cars 2021–2025, the i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT) ranks 5th of 11 in Combined consumption, 5th of 11 in Tank range, 6th of 11 in 0–100 km/h, behind the only Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT). Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
67hp
96 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
15.2s
VMax 156 km/h
Cons.
5.5L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Full specifications Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT)
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 998 cm³ |
| Power | 67 hp |
| Couple | 96 Nm |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 15,2 s |
| VMax | 156 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 3,670 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,425 mm |
| Width | 1,680 mm |
| Height | 1,480 mm |
| Boot | 252 L |
| Kerb weight | 919 kg |
| CO₂ WLTP | 126 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 11 city cars, the i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT) ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT) (1st with 5.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT) (1st with 741 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (5th of 11 in Combined consumption)
The i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT) consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT) (5.4 L/100).
Tank range: 727 km (5th of 11 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT) covers 727 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 741 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT) stands against city cars
Comparison across 11 city cars marketed between 2021–2025.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Hyundai i10 III range
Generation III launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the III
Popular duels involving the i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT)
Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
727 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 11 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT) leads in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i10 1.0 MPi 4 Seater (5MT) vs Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 5 Seater (5MT) duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.