PD · GENERATION 2020 · COMPACT
HyundaiICE

i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS

120 hp, 11,2 s 0-100 : among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS ranks 79th of 137 in Combined consumption, 78th of 130 in Tank range, 138th of 143 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,78815,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

120hp

172 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

11.2s

VMax 196 km/h

Cons.

5.9L

/100 km

Tank

50L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Hyundai i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement998 cm³
Power120 hp
Couple172 Nm
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.9 L/100km
Tank50 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h11,2 s
VMax196 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,340 mm
Wheelbase2,650 mm
Width1,795 mm
Height1,455 mm
Boot395 L
Kerb weight1,204 kg

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 143 compacts, the i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.9 L/100 L/100 (79th of 137 in Combined consumption)

The i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS consumes 5.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 847 km (78th of 130 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS covers 847 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.

Segment positioning

Where the i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS stands against compacts

Comparison across 143 compacts marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption79e / 137
5.9 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic
Tank range78e / 130
847 km
Min 520 km · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h138e / 143
11,2 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 Wagon 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Hyundai i30 PD range

Generation PD launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the PD

Compare

Popular duels involving the i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS

Frequently asked questions

Hyundai i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS ranks 79th of 137 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 78th of 130 in Tank range (847 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 138th of 143 in 0–100 km/h (11.2 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).

847 km on a full tank (5.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 78th of 130 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 5.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i30 1.0 T-GDi 120 PS vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.