KIA Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD
136 hp, 9,5 s 0-100 : among the 52 compacts 2014–2018, the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD ranks 4th of 48 in Combined consumption, 8th of 44 in Tank range, 45th of 52 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 136 hp
- 300 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9.5 s
- VMax 205 km/h
- Cons.
- 4.5 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Power
- 136 hp
- Couple
- 300 Nm
- Gearbox
- Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 4.5 L/100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9,5 s
- VMax
- 205 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Width
- 1,745 mm
- Height
- 1,480 mm
- Kerb weight
- 1,330 kg
- Cd
- 0.31
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 52 compacts, the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 4th of 48 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100), 8th of 44 in Tank range (1111 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 216d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 116d (1st with 1209 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (4th of 48 in Combined consumption)
The Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 216d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1111 km (8th of 44 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD covers 1111 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1209 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD stands against compacts
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD
Continue with the KIA Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD
The same car, from other angles.
Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD rank in its segment?
Among the 52 compacts 2014–2018, the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD ranks 4th of 48 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the BMW 216d), 8th of 44 in Tank range (1111 km, behind the BMW 116d), 45th of 52 in 0–100 km/h (9.5 s, behind the BMW M140i xDrive).
What is the range of the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD?
1111 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 8th of 44 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 216d instead?
The BMW 216d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD vs BMW 216d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.