KIA Stinger GT 3.3T AWD

PetrolsaloonGENERATION CK, 2022

370 hp, 4,9 s 0-100 : among the 29 saloons 2020–2024, the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD ranks 23th of 29 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 29 in Top speed, 23th of 29 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
370 hp
510 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.9 s
VMax 270 km/h
Cons.
12.0 L
/100 km
Tank
60 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Power
370 hp
Couple
510 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
12.0 L/100 km
Tank
60 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
4,9 s
VMax
270 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width
1,895 mm
Height
1,415 mm
Kerb weight
1,855 kg
Cd
0.32

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 29 saloons, the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 2nd of 29 in Top speed (270 km/h). 2nd of 29 in Top speed (270 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 307 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.9 s 0-100 (23th of 29 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD ranks 23th of 29 in 0–100 km/h, 1.4 s off the reference BMW M4 Competition M xDrive (3.5 s).

Top speed: 270 km/h (2nd of 29 in Top speed)

Top speed of 270 km/h. The segment reference reaches 307 km/h.

Where the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD stands against saloons

Comparison across 29 saloons marketed between 2020–2024.
0–100 km/h23e / 29
4,9 s
Min 5,8 s · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 3,5 s · BMW M4 Competition M xDrive
Top speed2e / 29
270 km/h
Min 240 km/h · Kia Stinger 2.5T RWDMax 307 km/h · Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight23e / 29
199 hp/t
Min 169 hp/t · Kia Stinger 2.5T RWDMax 323 hp/t · Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Popular duels involving the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD

Continue with the KIA Stinger GT 3.3T AWD

The same car, from other angles.

Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD rank in its segment?

Among the 29 saloons 2020–2024, the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD ranks 23th of 29 in 0–100 km/h (4.9 s, behind the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive), 2nd of 29 in Top speed (270 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 23th of 29 in Power-to-weight (199 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).

How much does the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW M4 Competition M xDrive instead?

The BMW M4 Competition M xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s vs 4.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Stinger GT 3.3T AWD vs BMW M4 Competition M xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.