Among the 21 S 2020–2024, the Huracán Tecnica ranks 4th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s, behind the Lamborghini Huracán STO), 3rd of 21 in Top speed (325 km/h, behind the Ferrari 812 GTS), 4th of 21 in Power-to-weight (423 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 GTS).
I · GENERATION 2022 → · SPORTS CAR
LamborghiniICE
Huracán Tecnica
639 hp, 3,2 s 0-100 : among the 21 S 2020–2024, the Huracán Tecnica ranks 4th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 3rd of 21 in Top speed, 4th of 21 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
639hp
600 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.2s
VMax 325 km/h
Cons.
-L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Lamborghini Huracán Tecnica
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 639 hp |
| Couple | 600 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,2 s |
| VMax | 325 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,924 mm |
| Height | 1,165 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,509 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 21 S, the Huracán Tecnica ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 4th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 3rd of 21 in Top speed (325 km/h), 4th of 21 in Power-to-weight (423 hp/t). 4th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s), 3rd of 21 in Top speed (325 km/h), 4th of 21 in Power-to-weight (423 hp/t).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Huracán STO (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Ferrari 812 GTS (1st with 340 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.2 s 0-100 (4th of 21 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Huracán Tecnica ranks 4th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Lamborghini Huracán STO (3.0 s).
Top speed: 325 km/h (3rd of 21 in Top speed)
Top speed of 325 km/h. The segment reference reaches 340 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Huracán Tecnica stands against S
Comparison across 21 S marketed between 2020–2024.
0–100 km/h4e / 21
3,2 s
Min 5,7 s · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 3,0 s · Lamborghini Huracán STO
Top speed3e / 21
325 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 340 km/h · Ferrari 812 GTS
Power-to-weight4e / 21
423 hp/t
Min 188 hp/t · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 490 hp/t · Ferrari 812 GTS
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
911 Turbo S588 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
911 Turbo S Cabriolet588 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
911 Turbo S568 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Huracán Tecnica
Frequently asked questions
Lamborghini Huracán Tecnica: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Huracán STO leads in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s vs 3.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Huracán Tecnica vs Lamborghini Huracán STO duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.