Among the 41 D-SUV 2018–2022, the NX 300h AWD ranks 12th of 41 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 40th of 41 in 0–100 km/h (9.2 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).
AZ10 · GENERATION 2020 → · FAMILY SUV
LexusHEV
NX 300h AWD
197 hp, 9,2 s 0-100 : among the 41 D-SUV 2018–2022, the NX 300h AWD ranks 12th of 41 in Combined consumption, 40th of 41 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
197hp
210 Nm · 141 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
9.2s
VMax 180 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Lexus NX 300h AWD
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Puissance électrique | 141 hp |
| Combined power | 197 hp |
| Couple | 210 Nm |
| Gearbox | CVT Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,2 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,845 mm |
| Height | 1,645 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,795 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 41 D-SUV, the NX 300h AWD ranks (top 12 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
D-SUV among the best in segment: 12th of 41 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (12th of 41 in Combined consumption)
The NX 300h AWD consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the NX 300h AWD stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 41 D-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption12e / 41
6 L/100
Min 14.2 L/100 · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X3 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h40e / 41
9,2 s
Min 11,8 s · Peugeot 5008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8Max 4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q5 Sportback204 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Q5 Sportback204 hp · 0-100 8.6 s
Q5 SUV204 hp · 0-100 7.4 s
Q5 SUV204 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the NX 300h AWD
Frequently asked questions
Lexus NX 300h AWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the NX 300h AWD vs Bmw X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.