W463 · GENERATION 2024 · LUXURY SUV
MercedesMHEV

AMG G 63

585 hp, 4,4 s 0-100 : among the 6 F-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the AMG G 63 ranks 2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 6 in Top speed, 2nd of 6 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Mercedes AMG G 63. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,87015,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

585hp

850 Nm · 20 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

4.4s

VMax 220 km/h

Cons.

15.0L

/100 km

Tank

100L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Mercedes AMG G 63

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement3,982 cm\u00b3
Puissance électrique20 hp
Combined power585 hp
Couple850 Nm
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP15,0 L/100km
Tank100 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,4 s
VMax220 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,873 mm
Wheelbase2,890 mm
Width1,984 mm
Height1,976 mm
Boot640 L
Kerb weight2,640 kg
CO₂ WLTP358 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 6 F-SUV hybrid, the AMG G 63 ranks (top 2 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s), 2nd of 6 in Top speed (220 km/h), 2nd of 6 in Power-to-weight (222 hp/t).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Mercedes AMG G 63 (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Mercedes AMG G 63 (1st with 220 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.4 s 0-100 (2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the AMG G 63 ranks 2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Mercedes AMG G 63 (4.4 s).

Top speed: 220 km/h (2nd of 6 in Top speed)

Top speed of 220 km/h. The segment reference reaches 220 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the AMG G 63 stands against F-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 6 F-SUV hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.

0–100 km/h

2eout of 6

4,4 s
Min5,8 s · Mercedes G 450 d
Max4,4 s · Mercedes AMG G 63

Top speed

2eout of 6

220 km/h
Min210 km/h · Mercedes G 500
Max220 km/h · Mercedes AMG G 63

Power-to-weight

2eout of 6

222 hp/t
Min144 hp/t · Mercedes G 450 d
Max222 hp/t · Mercedes AMG G 63

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Mercedes G-Class W463 range

Generation W463 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the W463

Compare

Popular duels involving the AMG G 63

Take the next step

Find a AMG G 63 or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Mercedes AMG G 63: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the AMG G 63 rank in its segment?#

Among the 6 F-SUV hybrid 2022–2026, the AMG G 63 ranks 2nd of 6 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s, behind the Mercedes AMG G 63), 2nd of 6 in Top speed (220 km/h, behind the Mercedes AMG G 63), 2nd of 6 in Power-to-weight (222 hp/t, behind the Mercedes AMG G 63).

How much does the AMG G 63 cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Mercedes AMG G 63 instead?#

The Mercedes AMG G 63 leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 4.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the AMG G 63 vs Mercedes AMG G 63 duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.