BMW X7 xDrive40i

Essence hybrideluxury SUVGENERATION G07, 2021

333 hp, 6,3 s 0-100 : among the 3 F-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X7 xDrive40i ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h, behind the only BMW X7 xDrive40d. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
333 hp
450 Nm, dont 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.3 s
VMax 243 km/h
Cons.
8.6 L
/100 km
Tank
83 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
6 cyl.
Displacement
2,998 cm³
Electric power
11 hp
Combined power
333 hp
Couple
450 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
8.6 L/100 km
Tank
83 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
6,3 s
VMax
243 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
5,151 mm
Wheelbase
3,105 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
1,805 mm
Boot
326 L
Kerb weight
2,360 kg
Cd
0.33
CO₂ WLTP
197 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 3 F-SUV hybrid, the X7 xDrive40i ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X7 xDrive40d (1st with 6.6 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X7 xDrive40d (1st with 1212 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 8.6 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)

The X7 xDrive40i consumes 8.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X7 xDrive40d (6.6 L/100).

Tank range: 965 km (Tank range)

On a full tank, the X7 xDrive40i covers 965 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1212 km.

Where the X7 xDrive40i stands against F-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 3 F-SUV hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption3e / 3
8.6 L/100
Min 8.6 L/100 · BMW X7 xDrive40iMax 6.6 L/100 · BMW X7 xDrive40d
Tank range3e / 3
965 km
Min 965 km · BMW X7 xDrive40iMax 1 212 km · BMW X7 xDrive40d
0–100 km/h3e / 3
6,3 s
Min 6,3 s · BMW X7 xDrive40iMax 6,1 s · BMW X7 xDrive40d

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW X7 G07 range

Generation G07 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G07

Popular duels involving the X7 xDrive40i

Continue with the BMW X7 xDrive40i

The same car, from other angles.

BMW X7 xDrive40i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X7 xDrive40i rank in its segment?

Among the 3 F-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X7 xDrive40i ranks Combined consumption (8.6 L/100, behind the BMW X7 xDrive40d), Tank range (965 km, behind the BMW X7 xDrive40d), 0–100 km/h (6.3 s, behind the BMW X7 xDrive40d).

What is the range of the X7 xDrive40i?

965 km on a full tank (8.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - Tank range.

How much does the X7 xDrive40i cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW X7 xDrive40d instead?

The BMW X7 xDrive40d leads in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100 vs 8.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X7 xDrive40i vs BMW X7 xDrive40d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.