BMW X7 xDrive50i
462 hp, 5,4 s 0-100 : among the 5 F-SUV 2016–2020, the X7 xDrive50i ranks 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 5 in Top speed, 3rd of 5 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Urus. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 462 hp
- 650 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 5.4 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 11.4 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 83 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 8 cyl.
- Displacement
- 4,395 cm³
- Power
- 462 hp
- Couple
- 650 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 11.4 L/100 km
- Tank
- 83 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 5,4 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,151 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,105 mm
- Width
- 2,000 mm
- Height
- 1,805 mm
- Boot
- 326 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,460 kg
- Cd
- 0.34
- CO₂ WLTP
- 261 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 5 F-SUV, the X7 xDrive50i ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 2nd of 5 in Top speed (250 km/h). 2nd of 5 in Top speed (250 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Urus (1st with 3.6 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Urus (1st with 305 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.4 s 0-100 (3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the X7 xDrive50i ranks 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h, 1.8 s off the reference Lamborghini Urus (3.6 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (2nd of 5 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 305 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the X7 xDrive50i stands against F-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X7 G07 range
Generation G07 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G07
Popular duels involving the X7 xDrive50i
Continue with the BMW X7 xDrive50i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW X7 xDrive50i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the X7 xDrive50i rank in its segment?
Among the 5 F-SUV 2016–2020, the X7 xDrive50i ranks 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (5.4 s, behind the Lamborghini Urus), 2nd of 5 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Urus), 3rd of 5 in Power-to-weight (188 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Urus).
How much does the X7 xDrive50i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Lamborghini Urus instead?
The Lamborghini Urus leads in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s vs 5.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X7 xDrive50i vs Lamborghini Urus duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.