Among the 2 S 2023–2027, the Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series ranks 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic), Top speed (260 km/h, behind the Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic), Power-to-weight (285 hp/t, behind the Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic).
2025 · GENERATION 2025 → · SPORTS CAR
MercedesICE
Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series
585 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 2 S 2023–2027, the Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series ranks 0–100 km/h, Top speed, Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
585hp
800 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.1s
VMax 260 km/h
Cons.
13.6L
/100 km
Tank
70L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 3,982 cm³ |
| Power | 585 hp |
| Couple | 800 Nm |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 13.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 70 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,1 s |
| VMax | 260 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,697 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm |
| Height | 1,358 mm |
| Boot | 240 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,050 kg |
| CO₂ WLTP | 309 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 2 S, the Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series ranks in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series ranks 0–100 km/h, 0.1 s off the reference Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic (4.0 s).
Top speed: 260 km/h (Top speed)
Top speed of 260 km/h. The segment reference reaches 314 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series stands against S
Comparison across 2 S marketed between 2023–2027.
0–100 km/h2e / 2
4,1 s
Min 4,1 s · Mercedes Maybach SL 680 Monogram SeriesMax 4,0 s · Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic
Top speed2e / 2
260 km/h
Min 260 km/h · Mercedes Maybach SL 680 Monogram SeriesMax 314 km/h · Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic
Power-to-weight2e / 2
285 hp/t
Min 285 hp/t · Mercedes Maybach SL 680 Monogram SeriesMax 350 hp/t · Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
911 Turbo S588 hp · 0-100 2.9 s
911 Turbo S Cabriolet588 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
911 Turbo S568 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes Maybach range
Other versions
Compare
Popular duels involving the Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic leads in 0–100 km/h (4.0 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series vs Porsche 2023 911 Sport Classic duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.