GT-R 570 R35
578 hp, 2,7 s 0-100 : among the 47 S 2015–2019, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks 1st of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 16th of 47 in Top speed, 18th of 47 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
578hp
637 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
2.7s
VMax 315 km/h
Cons.
12.5L
/100 km
Tank
74L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 578 hp |
| Couple | 637 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 6 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | GT-R 570 R35 |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12,5 L/100km |
| Tank | 74 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 2,7 s |
| VMax | 315 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,752 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 47 S, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 1st of 47 in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s), 16th of 47 in Top speed (315 km/h). 1st of 47 in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s), 16th of 47 in Top speed (315 km/h).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador S (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the Ferrari 812 Superfast (1st with 524 hp/t) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 2.7 s 0-100 (1st of 47 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks 1st of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 315 km/h (16th of 47 in Top speed)
Top speed of 315 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the GT-R 570 R35 stands against S
Comparison across 47 S marketed between 2015–2019.
0–100 km/h
1eout of 47
Top speed
16eout of 47
Power-to-weight
18eout of 47
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE R P575
575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series
585 hp · 0-100 4.1 s
Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series Roadster
585 hp · 0-100 4.1 s
911 Turbo S Cabriolet
588 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the GT-R 570 R35
Take the next step
Find a GT-R 570 R35 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Nissan GT-R 570 R35: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 47 S 2015–2019, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks 1st of 47 in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 16th of 47 in Top speed (315 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 18th of 47 in Power-to-weight (330 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.