Among the 46 S 2015–2019, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks 1st of 46 in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 16th of 46 in Top speed (315 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 18th of 46 in Power-to-weight (330 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
R35 · GENERATION 2017 → · SPORTS CAR
NissanICE
GT-R 570 R35
578 hp, 2,7 s 0-100 : among the 46 S 2015–2019, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks 1st of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 16th of 46 in Top speed, 18th of 46 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
578hp
637 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
2.7s
VMax 315 km/h
Cons.
12.5L
/100 km
Tank
74L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 578 hp |
| Couple | 637 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 74 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 2,7 s |
| VMax | 315 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,752 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 46 S, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 1st of 46 in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s), 16th of 46 in Top speed (315 km/h). 1st of 46 in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s), 16th of 46 in Top speed (315 km/h).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the Ferrari 812 Superfast (1st with 524 hp/t) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 2.7 s 0-100 (1st of 46 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the GT-R 570 R35 ranks 1st of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 315 km/h (16th of 46 in Top speed)
Top speed of 315 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the GT-R 570 R35 stands against S
Comparison across 46 S marketed between 2015–2019.
0–100 km/h1e / 46
2,7 s
Min 4,6 s · Porsche 718 CaymanMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed16e / 46
315 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight18e / 46
330 hp/t
Min 221 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series585 hp · 0-100 4.1 s
Maybach SL 680 Monogram Series Roadster585 hp · 0-100 4.1 s
911 Turbo S568 hp · 0-100 3.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the GT-R 570 R35
Frequently asked questions
Nissan GT-R 570 R35: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.