Among the 33 S 2013–2017, the 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet ranks 22th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 23th of 33 in Top speed (303 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador S), 18th of 33 in Power-to-weight (312 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).
991.1 · GENERATION 2015 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet
480 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 33 S 2013–2017, the 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet ranks 22th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 23th of 33 in Top speed, 18th of 33 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
480hp
570 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.1s
VMax 303 km/h
Cons.
11.8L
/100 km
Tank
68.13738L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,800 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 436 hp |
| Combined power | 480 hp |
| Couple | 570 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.8 L/100km |
| Tank | 68.13738 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,1 s |
| VMax | 303 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,509 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,294 mm |
| Boot | 125 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,540 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 33 S, the 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (22th of 33 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet ranks 22th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 1.4 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).
Top speed: 303 km/h (23th of 33 in Top speed)
Top speed of 303 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet stands against S
Comparison across 33 S marketed between 2013–2017.
0–100 km/h22e / 33
4,1 s
Min 4,8 s · Porsche 911 Carrera 4Max 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed23e / 33
303 km/h
Min 282 km/h · Porsche Cayman SMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador S
Power-to-weight18e / 33
312 hp/t
Min 242 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 CabrioletMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Huracán EVO RWD610 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
Huracán LP 610-4610 hp · 0-100 3.2 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Carrera 4 GTS Cabriolet vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.