Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG
220 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 25 D-SUV 2022–2026, the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG ranks 17th of 25 in Combined consumption, 19th of 21 in Tank range, 17th of 25 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
220hp
350 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.3s
VMax 215 km/h
Cons.
8.0L
/100 km
Tank
58L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,984 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 220 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 8,0 L/100km |
| Tank | 58 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,3 s |
| VMax | 215 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,705 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 182 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 25 D-SUV, the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 8.0 L/100 L/100 (17th of 25 in Combined consumption)
The Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG consumes 8.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 (5.4 L/100).
Tank range: 725 km (19th of 21 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG covers 725 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1019 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 25 D-SUV marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption
17eout of 25
Tank range
19eout of 21
0–100 km/h
17eout of 25
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
X3 xDrive30i
252 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
X3 xDrive30i
252 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
X4 xDrive30i
252 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
Macan
252 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG
Take the next step
Find a Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 25 D-SUV 2022–2026, the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG ranks 17th of 25 in Combined consumption (8.0 L/100, behind the Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300), 19th of 21 in Tank range (725 km, behind the Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300), 17th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Audi SQ5 Sportback).
725 km on a full tank (8.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 19th of 21 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 leads in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100 vs 8.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSG vs Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.