BMW X1 xDrive18d
150 hp, 9,3 s 0-100 : among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X1 xDrive18d ranks 9th of 30 in Combined consumption, 9th of 26 in Tank range, 20th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 150 hp
- 350 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9.3 s
- VMax 204 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.0 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,995 cm³
- Power
- 150 hp
- Couple
- 350 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 6 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.0 L/100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9,3 s
- VMax
- 204 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,439 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,670 mm
- Width
- 1,821 mm
- Height
- 1,598 mm
- Boot
- 505 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,580 kg
- Cd
- 0.29
- CO₂ WLTP
- 132 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 30 C-SUV, the X1 xDrive18d ranks (top 9 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 9th of 30 in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100), 9th of 26 in Tank range (1020 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X1 xDrive18d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X1 xDrive18d (1st with 1419 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.0 L/100 L/100 (9th of 30 in Combined consumption)
The X1 xDrive18d consumes 5.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1020 km (9th of 26 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X1 xDrive18d covers 1020 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the X1 xDrive18d stands against C-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X1 F48 range
Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F48
Popular duels involving the X1 xDrive18d
Continue with the BMW X1 xDrive18d
The same car, from other angles.
BMW X1 xDrive18d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the X1 xDrive18d rank in its segment?
Among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X1 xDrive18d ranks 9th of 30 in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100, behind the BMW X1 xDrive18d), 9th of 26 in Tank range (1020 km, behind the BMW X1 xDrive18d), 20th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (9.3 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).
What is the range of the X1 xDrive18d?
1020 km on a full tank (5.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 9th of 26 in Tank range.
How much does the X1 xDrive18d cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X1 xDrive18d instead?
The BMW X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 xDrive18d vs BMW X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.