Among the 16 D-SUV 2024–2028, the Q5 Sportback ranks 9th of 16 in Combined consumption (7.9 L/100, behind the Audi Q5 Sportback), 9th of 14 in Tank range (823 km, behind the Audi Q5 Sportback), 11th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s, behind the Audi SQ5 Sportback).
FY · GENERATION 2026 → · FAMILY SUV
AudiICE
Q5 Sportback
204 hp, 7,2 s 0-100 : among the 16 D-SUV 2024–2028, the Q5 Sportback ranks 9th of 16 in Combined consumption, 9th of 14 in Tank range, 11th of 16 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
204hp
340 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.2s
VMax 226 km/h
Cons.
7.9L
/100 km
Tank
65L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi Q5 Sportback
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,984 cm³ |
| Power | 204 hp |
| Couple | 340 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.9 L/100km |
| Tank | 65 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,2 s |
| VMax | 226 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,717 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,823 mm |
| Width | 1,900 mm |
| Height | 1,619 mm |
| Boot | 515 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,910 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 179 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 16 D-SUV, the Q5 Sportback ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 7.9 L/100 L/100 (9th of 16 in Combined consumption)
The Q5 Sportback consumes 7.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi Q5 Sportback (6.7 L/100).
Tank range: 823 km (9th of 14 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Q5 Sportback covers 823 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 970 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Q5 Sportback stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 16 D-SUV marketed between 2024–2028.
Combined consumption9e / 16
7.9 L/100
Min 9.4 L/100 · Lexus NX 350 AWDMax 6.7 L/100 · Audi Q5 Sportback
Tank range9e / 14
823 km
Min 725 km · Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 220 4x4 7DSGMax 970 km · Audi Q5 Sportback
0–100 km/h11e / 16
7,2 s
Min 8,6 s · Audi Q5 SportbackMax 4,5 s · Audi SQ5 Sportback
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
X3 xDrive20i184 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
X3 xDrive20i184 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
X4 xDrive20i184 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
X4 xDrive20i184 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi Q5 FY range
Generation FY launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the FY
Compare
Popular duels involving the Q5 Sportback
Frequently asked questions
Audi Q5 Sportback: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
823 km on a full tank (7.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 9th of 14 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi Q5 Sportback leads in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100 vs 7.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q5 Sportback vs Audi Q5 Sportback duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.