Audi Q5 SUV
204 hp, 8,6 s 0-100 : among the 16 D-SUV 2024–2028, the Q5 SUV ranks 6th of 16 in Combined consumption, 6th of 14 in Tank range, 16th of 16 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 204 hp
- 340 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8.6 s
- VMax 226 km/h
- Cons.
- 7.3 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 65 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,984 cm³
- Power
- 204 hp
- Couple
- 340 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 7.3 L/100 km
- Tank
- 65 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8,6 s
- VMax
- 226 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,717 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,823 mm
- Width
- 1,900 mm
- Height
- 1,625 mm
- Boot
- 520 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,835 kg
- Cd
- 0.31
- CO₂ WLTP
- 165 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 16 D-SUV, the Q5 SUV ranks (top 6 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
D-SUV among the best in segment: 6th of 16 in Combined consumption (7.3 L/100).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,3 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Audi Q5 Sportback (1st with 6.7 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi Q5 Sportback (1st with 970 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.3 L/100 L/100 (6th of 16 in Combined consumption)
The Q5 SUV consumes 7.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi Q5 Sportback (6.7 L/100).
Tank range: 890 km (6th of 14 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Q5 SUV covers 890 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 970 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Q5 SUV stands against D-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi Q5 FY range
Generation FY launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the FY
Popular duels involving the Q5 SUV
Continue with the Audi Q5 SUV
The same car, from other angles.
Audi Q5 SUV: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Q5 SUV rank in its segment?
Among the 16 D-SUV 2024–2028, the Q5 SUV ranks 6th of 16 in Combined consumption (7.3 L/100, behind the Audi Q5 Sportback), 6th of 14 in Tank range (890 km, behind the Audi Q5 Sportback), 16th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (8.6 s, behind the Audi SQ5 SUV).
What is the range of the Q5 SUV?
890 km on a full tank (7.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 6th of 14 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the Q5 SUV cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Audi Q5 Sportback instead?
The Audi Q5 Sportback leads in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100 vs 7.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q5 SUV vs Audi Q5 Sportback duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.