X3 xDrive20i
184 hp, 8,3 s 0-100 : among the 29 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X3 xDrive20i ranks 15th of 29 in Combined consumption, 12th of 26 in Tank range, 26th of 29 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
300 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.3s
VMax 215 km/h
Cons.
7.0L
/100 km
Tank
65L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X3 xDrive20i
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 300 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7,0 L/100km |
| Tank | 65 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,3 s |
| VMax | 215 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,708 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,864 mm |
| Width | 1,891 mm |
| Height | 1,676 mm |
| Boot | 550 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,735 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 161 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 29 D-SUV, the X3 xDrive20i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 7.0 L/100 L/100 (15th of 29 in Combined consumption)
The X3 xDrive20i consumes 7.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 929 km (12th of 26 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X3 xDrive20i covers 929 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the X3 xDrive20i stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 29 D-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption
15eout of 29
Tank range
12eout of 26
0–100 km/h
26eout of 29
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q5 Sportback
204 hp · 0-100 8.6 s
Q5 SUV
204 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Q5 SUV
204 hp · 0-100 7.4 s
Q5 SUV
204 hp · 0-100 8.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X3 G01 range
Generation G01 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G01
Compare
Popular duels involving the X3 xDrive20i
Take the next step
Find a X3 xDrive20i or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW X3 xDrive20i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 29 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X3 xDrive20i ranks 15th of 29 in Combined consumption (7.0 L/100, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 12th of 26 in Tank range (929 km, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 26th of 29 in 0–100 km/h (8.3 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).
929 km on a full tank (7.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 12th of 26 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 7.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X3 xDrive20i vs Bmw X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.