Among the 27 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X3 xDrive20i ranks 13th of 27 in Combined consumption (7.0 L/100, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 11th of 25 in Tank range (929 km, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 25th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (8.3 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).
G01 · GENERATION 2021 → · FAMILY SUV
BMWICE
X3 xDrive20i
184 hp, 8,3 s 0-100 : among the 27 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X3 xDrive20i ranks 13th of 27 in Combined consumption, 11th of 25 in Tank range, 25th of 27 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
300 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.3s
VMax 215 km/h
Cons.
7.0L
/100 km
Tank
65L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X3 xDrive20i
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 300 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 65 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,3 s |
| VMax | 215 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,708 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,864 mm |
| Width | 1,891 mm |
| Height | 1,676 mm |
| Boot | 550 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,735 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 161 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 27 D-SUV, the X3 xDrive20i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 7.0 L/100 L/100 (13th of 27 in Combined consumption)
The X3 xDrive20i consumes 7.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 929 km (11th of 25 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X3 xDrive20i covers 929 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X3 xDrive20i stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 27 D-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption13e / 27
7 L/100
Min 14.2 L/100 · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X3 xDrive20d
Tank range11e / 25
929 km
Min 577 km · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 1 333 km · Bmw X3 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h25e / 27
8,3 s
Min 11,8 s · Peugeot 5008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8Max 4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q5 Sportback204 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Q5 Sportback204 hp · 0-100 8.6 s
Q5 SUV204 hp · 0-100 7.4 s
Q5 SUV204 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X3 G01 range
Generation G01 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G01
Compare
Popular duels involving the X3 xDrive20i
Frequently asked questions
BMW X3 xDrive20i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
929 km on a full tank (7.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 11th of 25 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 7.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X3 xDrive20i vs Bmw X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.