BMW 220i Gran Coupe
178 hp, 7,1 s 0-100 : among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i Gran Coupe ranks 45th of 103 in Combined consumption, 42th of 95 in Tank range, 38th of 107 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 178 hp
- 280 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.1 s
- VMax 238 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.7 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Power
- 178 hp
- Couple
- 280 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.7 L/100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,1 s
- VMax
- 238 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,526 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,670 mm
- Width
- 1,800 mm
- Height
- 1,420 mm
- Boot
- 430 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,430 kg
- Cd
- 0.25
- CO₂ WLTP
- 132 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 107 compacts, the 220i Gran Coupe ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.7 L/100 L/100 (45th of 103 in Combined consumption)
The 220i Gran Coupe consumes 5.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 877 km (42th of 95 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 220i Gran Coupe covers 877 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 220i Gran Coupe stands against compacts
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 2 Series F44 range
Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F44
Popular duels involving the 220i Gran Coupe
Continue with the BMW 220i Gran Coupe
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 220i Gran Coupe: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 220i Gran Coupe rank in its segment?
Among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i Gran Coupe ranks 45th of 103 in Combined consumption (5.7 L/100, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 42th of 95 in Tank range (877 km, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 38th of 107 in 0–100 km/h (7.1 s, behind the BMW M2).
What is the range of the 220i Gran Coupe?
877 km on a full tank (5.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 42th of 95 in Tank range.
How much does the 220i Gran Coupe cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 216d Steptronic instead?
The BMW 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 5.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 220i Gran Coupe vs BMW 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.