BMW 318d Steptronic
150 hp, 8,3 s 0-100 : among the 83 saloons 2017–2021, the 318d Steptronic ranks 7th of 83 in Combined consumption, 42th of 75 in Tank range, 78th of 83 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 150 hp
- 320 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8.3 s
- VMax 224 km/h
- Cons.
- 4.5 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 40 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,995 cm³
- Power
- 150 hp
- Couple
- 320 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 4.5 L/100 km
- Tank
- 40 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8,3 s
- VMax
- 224 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,709 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,851 mm
- Width
- 1,827 mm
- Height
- 1,435 mm
- Boot
- 480 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,455 kg
- Cd
- 0.23
- CO₂ WLTP
- 118 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 83 saloons, the 318d Steptronic ranks (top 7 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 7th of 83 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (7th of 83 in Combined consumption)
The 318d Steptronic consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 889 km (42th of 75 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 318d Steptronic covers 889 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 318d Steptronic stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Popular duels involving the 318d Steptronic
Continue with the BMW 318d Steptronic
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 318d Steptronic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 318d Steptronic rank in its segment?
Among the 83 saloons 2017–2021, the 318d Steptronic ranks 7th of 83 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the BMW 420d), 42th of 75 in Tank range (889 km, behind the BMW 420d), 78th of 83 in 0–100 km/h (8.3 s, behind the BMW M4 Competition).
What is the range of the 318d Steptronic?
889 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 42th of 75 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the 318d Steptronic cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 420d instead?
The BMW 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 318d Steptronic vs BMW 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.