Among the 23 saloons 2024–2028, the A5 Avant ranks 12th of 23 in Combined consumption (7.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 320d), 12th of 23 in Tank range (727 km, behind the Audi A5 Sedan), 23th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (9.8 s, behind the Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive).
9F · GENERATION 2026 → · SALOON
AudiICE
A5 Avant
150 hp, 9,8 s 0-100 : among the 23 saloons 2024–2028, the A5 Avant ranks 12th of 23 in Combined consumption, 12th of 23 in Tank range, 23th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
150hp
280 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.8s
VMax 214 km/h
Cons.
7.7L
/100 km
Tank
56L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi A5 Avant
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,984 cm³ |
| Power | 150 hp |
| Couple | 280 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 56 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,8 s |
| VMax | 214 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,829 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,897 mm |
| Width | 1,860 mm |
| Height | 1,424 mm |
| Boot | 476 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,710 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 174 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 23 saloons, the A5 Avant ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 7.7 L/100 L/100 (12th of 23 in Combined consumption)
The A5 Avant consumes 7.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 320d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 727 km (12th of 23 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A5 Avant covers 727 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1091 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the A5 Avant stands against saloons
Comparison across 23 saloons marketed between 2024–2028.
Combined consumption12e / 23
7.7 L/100
Min 12 L/100 · Ford Mustang Dark Horse 500Max 4.3 L/100 · Bmw 320d
Tank range12e / 23
727 km
Min 508 km · Ford Mustang Dark Horse 500Max 1 091 km · Audi A5 Sedan
0–100 km/h23e / 23
9,8 s
Min 9,8 s · Audi A5 AvantMax 3,5 s · Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
318i156 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
318i Sedan156 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
318i Touring156 hp · 0-100 8.7 s
318i Touring129 hp · 0-100 8.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi A5 9F range
Generation 9F launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 9F
Compare
Popular duels involving the A5 Avant
Frequently asked questions
Audi A5 Avant: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
727 km on a full tank (7.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 12th of 23 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 7.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A5 Avant vs Bmw 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.