G32 · GENERATION 2020 · GRAND TOURER
BMWMHEV

620d Gran Turismo

190 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 23 in Tank range, 22th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,51115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

190hp

400 Nm · 11 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

7.9s

VMax 220 km/h

Cons.

4.6L

/100 km

Tank

66L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 620d Gran Turismo

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Puissance électrique11 hp
Combined power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.6 L/100km
Tank66 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,9 s
VMax220 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,091 mm
Wheelbase3,070 mm
Width1,902 mm
Height1,538 mm
Boot600 L
Kerb weight1,835 kg
Cd0.25
CO₂ WLTP120 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100), 3rd of 23 in Tank range (1435 km).

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 520d Touring (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 520d Touring (1st with 1467 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.6 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 23 in Combined consumption)

The 620d Gran Turismo consumes 4.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d Touring (4.5 L/100).

Tank range: 1435 km (3rd of 23 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 620d Gran Turismo covers 1435 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1467 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 620d Gran Turismo stands against grand tourers hybrid

Comparison across 23 grand tourers hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption3e / 23
4.6 L/100
Min 7.4 L/100 · Bmw 640i xDrive Gran TurismoMax 4.5 L/100 · Bmw 520d Touring
Tank range3e / 23
1 435 km
Min 919 km · Bmw 640i xDrive Gran TurismoMax 1 467 km · Bmw 520d Touring
0–100 km/h22e / 23
7,9 s
Min 8,3 s · Bmw 520i TouringMax 4,8 s · Bmw 540d xDrive Touring

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 6 Series G32 range

Generation G32 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G32

Compare

Popular duels involving the 620d Gran Turismo

Frequently asked questions

BMW 620d Gran Turismo: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d Touring), 3rd of 23 in Tank range (1435 km, behind the Bmw 520d Touring), 22th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw 540d xDrive Touring).

1435 km on a full tank (4.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 3rd of 23 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 520d Touring leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 4.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 620d Gran Turismo vs Bmw 520d Touring duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.