Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d Touring), 3rd of 23 in Tank range (1435 km, behind the Bmw 520d Touring), 22th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw 540d xDrive Touring).
620d Gran Turismo
190 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 23 in Tank range, 22th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm · 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.9s
VMax 220 km/h
Cons.
4.6L
/100 km
Tank
66L
Full specifications BMW 620d Gran Turismo
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 11 hp |
| Combined power | 190 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 66 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,9 s |
| VMax | 220 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,091 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,070 mm |
| Width | 1,902 mm |
| Height | 1,538 mm |
| Boot | 600 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,835 kg |
| Cd | 0.25 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 120 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid, the 620d Gran Turismo ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100), 3rd of 23 in Tank range (1435 km).
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 520d Touring (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 520d Touring (1st with 1467 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.6 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 23 in Combined consumption)
The 620d Gran Turismo consumes 4.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d Touring (4.5 L/100).
Tank range: 1435 km (3rd of 23 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 620d Gran Turismo covers 1435 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1467 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 620d Gran Turismo stands against grand tourers hybrid
Comparison across 23 grand tourers hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 6 Series G32 range
Generation G32 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G32
Popular duels involving the 620d Gran Turismo
BMW 620d Gran Turismo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1435 km on a full tank (4.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 3rd of 23 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 520d Touring leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 4.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 620d Gran Turismo vs Bmw 520d Touring duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.