BMW 750i xDrive
530 hp, 4,0 s 0-100 : among the 48 limousines 2018–2022, the 750i xDrive ranks 17th of 48 in 0–100 km/h, 38th of 48 in Top speed, 11th of 48 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 530 hp
- 750 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.0 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 9.5 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 78 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 4,395 cm³
- Power
- 530 hp
- Couple
- 750 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 9.5 L/100 km
- Tank
- 78 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,0 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,120 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,070 mm
- Width
- 1,902 mm
- Height
- 1,467 mm
- Boot
- 515 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,970 kg
- Cd
- 0.27
- CO₂ WLTP
- 216 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 48 limousines, the 750i xDrive ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 11th of 48 in Power-to-weight (269 hp/t). 11th of 48 in Power-to-weight (269 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 315 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.0 s 0-100 (17th of 48 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 750i xDrive ranks 17th of 48 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo S (3.0 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (38th of 48 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 315 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 750i xDrive stands against limousines
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 7 Series G11 range
Generation G11 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G11
Popular duels involving the 750i xDrive
Continue with the BMW 750i xDrive
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 750i xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 750i xDrive rank in its segment?
Among the 48 limousines 2018–2022, the 750i xDrive ranks 17th of 48 in 0–100 km/h (4.0 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 38th of 48 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 11th of 48 in Power-to-weight (269 hp/t, behind the BMW M8 Competition Coupe).
How much does the 750i xDrive cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Porsche Panamera Turbo S instead?
The Porsche Panamera Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s vs 4.0 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 750i xDrive vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.