970.1 · GENERATION 2013 · LIMOUSINE
PorscheICE

Panamera Turbo

550 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 15 limousines 2011–2015, the Panamera Turbo ranks 4th of 15 in 0–100 km/h, 3rd of 15 in Top speed, 2nd of 15 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Panamera Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,96915,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsommation →

Power

550hp

770 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.1s

VMax 303 km/h

Cons.

13.1L

/100 km

Tank

99.934824L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Panamera Turbo

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · Naturally Aspirated
Displacement4,806 cm\u00b3
Puissance thermique507 hp
Combined power550 hp
Combined torque770 Nm
GearboxDUAL_CLUTCH Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP13,1 L/100km
Tank99.934824 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,1 s
VMax303 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,970 mm
Wheelbase2,920 mm
Width1,931 mm
Height1,418 mm
Boot44 L
Kerb weight1,970 kg
Cd0.29

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 15 limousines, the Panamera Turbo ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 4th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 3rd of 15 in Top speed (303 km/h), 2nd of 15 in Power-to-weight (279 hp/t). 4th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 3rd of 15 in Top speed (303 km/h), 2nd of 15 in Power-to-weight (279 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,1 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 306 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (4th of 15 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Panamera Turbo ranks 4th of 15 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo S (3.9 s).

Top speed: 303 km/h (3rd of 15 in Top speed)

Top speed of 303 km/h. The segment reference reaches 306 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Panamera Turbo stands against limousines

Comparison across 15 limousines marketed between 2011–2015.

0–100 km/h4e / 15
4,1 s
Min 5,9 s · Porsche PanameraMax 3,9 s · Porsche Panamera Turbo S
Top speed3e / 15
303 km/h
Min 256 km/h · Porsche Panamera 4Max 306 km/h · Porsche Panamera Turbo S
Power-to-weight2e / 15
279 hp/t
Min 167 hp/t · Porsche Panamera 4Max 316 hp/t · Porsche Panamera Turbo S

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Panamera Turbo

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Panamera Turbo: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 15 limousines 2011–2015, the Panamera Turbo ranks 4th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 3rd of 15 in Top speed (303 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 2nd of 15 in Power-to-weight (279 hp/t, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Porsche Panamera Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera Turbo vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.