Among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera Turbo ranks 1st of 30 in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 1st of 30 in Top speed (308 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 2nd of 30 in Power-to-weight (276 hp/t, behind the BMW M850i xDrive).
TurboPetrol
Porsche Panamera Turbo
550 hp, 3,6 s 0-100 : among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera Turbo ranks 1st of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 1st of 30 in Top speed, 2nd of 30 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
550hp
770 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.6s
VMax 308 km/h
Cons.
11.2L
/100 km
Tank
23.7L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- V · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo
- Displacement
- 3,996 cm³
- Puissance thermique
- 558 hp
- Combined power
- 550 hp
- Combined torque
- 770 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 11.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 23.7 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3,6 s
- VMax
- 308 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,050 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,949 mm
- Width
- 1,938 mm
- Height
- 1,425 mm
- Boot
- 18 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,996 kg
- Cd
- 0.3
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 30 limousines, the Panamera Turbo ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 1st of 30 in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s), 1st of 30 in Top speed (308 km/h), 2nd of 30 in Power-to-weight (276 hp/t). 1st of 30 in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s), 1st of 30 in Top speed (308 km/h), 2nd of 30 in Power-to-weight (276 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Power-to-weight, the BMW M850i xDrive (1st with 280 hp/t) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.6 s 0-100 (1st of 30 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Panamera Turbo ranks 1st of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo (3.6 s).
Top speed: 308 km/h (1st of 30 in Top speed)
Top speed of 308 km/h. The segment reference reaches 308 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Panamera Turbo stands against limousines
Comparison across 30 limousines marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h1e / 30
3,6 s
Min 5,5 s · BMW 840i ConvertibleMax 3,6 s · Porsche Panamera Turbo
Top speed1e / 30
308 km/h
Min 250 km/h · BMW 840d xDriveMax 308 km/h · Porsche Panamera Turbo
Power-to-weight2e / 30
276 hp/t
Min 164 hp/t · Porsche Panamera 4Max 280 hp/t · BMW M850i xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
PetrolBMW 750i xDrive530 hp · 4.0 sPetrolBMW 750Li xDrive530 hp · 4.1 sPetrolBMW M850i xDrive 2018530 hp · 3.7 sPetrolBMW M850i xDrive 2020530 hp · 3.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Panamera 971 range
Generation 971 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 971
Popular duels involving the Panamera Turbo
Continue with the Porsche Panamera Turbo
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche Panamera Turbo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.