BMW 735i
286 hp, 6,7 s 0-100 : among the 15 limousines hybrid 2020–2024, the 735i ranks 14th of 15 in Combined consumption, 14th of 15 in Tank range, 15th of 15 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 286 hp
- 425 Nm, dont 18 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.7 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 7.5 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 74 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,998 cm³
- Puissance électrique
- 18 hp
- Combined power
- 286 hp
- Couple
- 425 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 7.5 L/100 km
- Tank
- 74 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,7 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,391 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,215 mm
- Width
- 1,950 mm
- Height
- 1,544 mm
- Boot
- 540 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,075 kg
- Cd
- 0.26
- CO₂ WLTP
- 182 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 15 limousines hybrid, the 735i ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 730d (1st with 4.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 730d (1st with 1592 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.5 L/100 L/100 (14th of 15 in Combined consumption)
The 735i consumes 7.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 730d (4.9 L/100).
Tank range: 987 km (14th of 15 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 735i covers 987 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1592 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 735i stands against limousines hybrid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 7 Series G11 range
Generation G11 launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G11
Popular duels involving the 735i
Continue with the BMW 735i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 735i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 735i rank in its segment?
Among the 15 limousines hybrid 2020–2024, the 735i ranks 14th of 15 in Combined consumption (7.5 L/100, behind the BMW 730d), 14th of 15 in Tank range (987 km, behind the BMW 730d), 15th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (6.7 s, behind the BMW 760i xDrive).
What is the range of the 735i?
987 km on a full tank (7.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 14th of 15 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the 735i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 730d instead?
The BMW 730d leads in Combined consumption (4.9 L/100 vs 7.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 735i vs BMW 730d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.