I20 · GENERATION 2022 · COMPACT SUV
BMWBEV

iX1 xDrive30

313 hp, 417 km range, 5,6 s 0-100 : among the 4 C-SUV electric 2020–2024, the iX1 xDrive30 ranks WLTP range, DC charge power, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate54815,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhRange →

Power

313hp

494 Nm · 190 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

5.6s

VMax 180 km/h

Range

417km

WLTP

DC charging

130kW

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW iX1 xDrive30

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique190 hp
Combined power313 hp
Couple494 Nm
GearboxMono-rapport 1 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Battery and charging

Battery capacity60.2 kWh
Range WLTP417 km
Charge AC max11 kW
Charge DC max130 kW
Conso élec WLTP17.4 kWh/100km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h5,6 s
VMax180 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,500 mm
Wheelbase2,692 mm
Width1,845 mm
Height1,616 mm
Boot490 L
Kerb weight2,010 kg
Cd0.26

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 4 C-SUV electric, the iX1 xDrive30 ranks in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (1st with 517 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (1st with 175 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 417 km WLTP (WLTP range)

The iX1 xDrive30 offers 417 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (517 km).

Charging: 130 kW DC (DC charge power)

The iX1 xDrive30 accepts up to 130 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (175 kW).

Segment positioning

Where the iX1 xDrive30 stands against C-SUV electric

Comparison across 4 C-SUV electric marketed between 2020–2024.

WLTP range3e / 4
417 km
Min 340 km · Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWDMax 517 km · Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW
DC charge power2e / 2
130 kW
Min 130 kW · Bmw iX1 xDrive30Max 175 kW · Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW
0–100 km/h4e / 4
5,6 s
Min 5,6 s · Bmw iX1 xDrive30Max 4,9 s · Volvo XC40 Recharge Twin AWD

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW iX I20 range

Generation I20 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the I20

Compare

Popular duels involving the iX1 xDrive30

Frequently asked questions

BMW iX1 xDrive30: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 4 C-SUV electric 2020–2024, the iX1 xDrive30 ranks WLTP range (417 km, behind the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW), DC charge power (130 kW, behind the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW), 0–100 km/h (5.6 s, behind the Volvo XC40 Recharge Twin AWD).

417 km WLTP announced - making it the autonomie du segment out of 4 models. The reference is the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (517 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.