Among the 24 saloons 2019–2023, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks 5th of 24 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive), 22th of 24 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD), 2nd of 24 in Power-to-weight (296 hp/t, behind the Bmw M4 Competition).
M4 Competition Coupe
510 hp, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 24 saloons 2019–2023, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks 5th of 24 in 0–100 km/h, 22th of 24 in Top speed, 2nd of 24 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
510hp
650 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.9s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
10.2L
/100 km
Tank
59L
Full specifications BMW M4 Competition Coupe
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 6 cyl. |
| Displacement | 2,993 cm³ |
| Power | 510 hp |
| Couple | 650 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 59 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,9 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,794 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,857 mm |
| Width | 1,887 mm |
| Height | 1,393 mm |
| Boot | 440 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,725 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 234 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 24 saloons, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks (top 5 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 5th of 24 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 2nd of 24 in Power-to-weight (296 hp/t). 5th of 24 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 2nd of 24 in Power-to-weight (296 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M3 Competition xDrive (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD (1st with 270 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.9 s 0-100 (5th of 24 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M4 Competition Coupe ranks 5th of 24 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference BMW M3 Competition xDrive (3.5 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (22th of 24 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 270 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the M4 Competition Coupe stands against saloons
Comparison across 24 saloons marketed between 2019–2023.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW M4 G82 range
Generation G82 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G82
Popular duels involving the M4 Competition Coupe
BMW M4 Competition Coupe: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The BMW M3 Competition xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s vs 3.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M4 Competition Coupe vs BMW M3 Competition xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.