BMW M4 Competition M xDrive
530 hp, 3,5 s 0-100 : among the 14 saloons 2022–2026, the M4 Competition M xDrive ranks 1st of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 6th of 14 in Top speed, 2nd of 14 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 530 hp
- 650 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3.5 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 10.1 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,993 cm³
- Power
- 530 hp
- Couple
- 650 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 10.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3,5 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,801 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,857 mm
- Width
- 1,887 mm
- Height
- 1,398 mm
- Boot
- 440 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,775 kg
- Cd
- 0.34
- CO₂ WLTP
- 229 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 saloons, the M4 Competition M xDrive ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 1st of 14 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s), 2nd of 14 in Power-to-weight (299 hp/t). 1st of 14 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s), 2nd of 14 in Power-to-weight (299 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,1 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Top speed, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 307 km/h) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 323 hp/t) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.5 s 0-100 (1st of 14 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M4 Competition M xDrive ranks 1st of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference BMW M4 Competition M xDrive (3.5 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (6th of 14 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 307 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the M4 Competition M xDrive stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW M4 G82 range
Generation G82 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G82
Popular duels involving the M4 Competition M xDrive
Continue with the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive
The same car, from other angles.
BMW M4 Competition M xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the M4 Competition M xDrive rank in its segment?
Among the 14 saloons 2022–2026, the M4 Competition M xDrive ranks 1st of 14 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s, behind the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive), 6th of 14 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 2nd of 14 in Power-to-weight (299 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).
How much does the M4 Competition M xDrive cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.