G82 · GENERATION 2021 · SALOON
BMWICE

M4 Coupe

480 hp, 4,2 s 0-100 : among the 24 saloons 2019–2023, the M4 Coupe ranks 7th of 24 in 0–100 km/h, 16th of 24 in Top speed, 7th of 24 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,27215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

480hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.2s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

10.8L

/100 km

Tank

59L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW M4 Coupe

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture6 cyl.
Displacement2,993 cm³
Power480 hp
Couple550 Nm
GearboxManuelle 6 rapports Manuelle

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10.8 L/100km
Tank59 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,2 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,794 mm
Wheelbase2,857 mm
Width1,887 mm
Height1,393 mm
Boot440 L
Kerb weight1,700 kg
Cd0.34
CO₂ WLTP248 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 24 saloons, the M4 Coupe ranks (top 7 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 7th of 24 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s), 7th of 24 in Power-to-weight (282 hp/t). 7th of 24 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s), 7th of 24 in Power-to-weight (282 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M3 Competition xDrive (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD (1st with 270 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.2 s 0-100 (7th of 24 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the M4 Coupe ranks 7th of 24 in 0–100 km/h, 0.7 s off the reference BMW M3 Competition xDrive (3.5 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (16th of 24 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 270 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the M4 Coupe stands against saloons

Comparison across 24 saloons marketed between 2019–2023.

0–100 km/h7e / 24
4,2 s
Min 5,8 s · Kia Stinger 2.5T RWDMax 3,5 s · BMW M3 Competition xDrive
Top speed16e / 24
250 km/h
Min 240 km/h · Kia Stinger 2.5T RWDMax 270 km/h · Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD
Power-to-weight7e / 24
282 hp/t
Min 169 hp/t · Kia Stinger 2.5T RWDMax 296 hp/t · Bmw M4 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW M4 G82 range

Generation G82 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G82

Compare

Popular duels involving the M4 Coupe

Frequently asked questions

BMW M4 Coupe: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 24 saloons 2019–2023, the M4 Coupe ranks 7th of 24 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive), 16th of 24 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD), 7th of 24 in Power-to-weight (282 hp/t, behind the Bmw M4 Competition).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The BMW M3 Competition xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s vs 4.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M4 Coupe vs BMW M3 Competition xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.