G90 · GENERATION 2024 · GRAND TOURER

Power

727hp

1000 Nm · 727 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

3.5s

VMax 305 km/h

Range

-km

WLTP

DC charging

-kW

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW M5 Touring

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique727 hp
Combined power727 hp
Couple1000 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,5 s
VMax305 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,105 mm
Wheelbase2,982 mm
Width1,970 mm
Height1,514 mm
Kerb weight2,390 kg
Cd0.31
CO₂ WLTP39 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 10th of 32 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s). 10th of 32 in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Tesla Model S Plaid (1st with 2.1 s) takes the lead.

Segment positioning

Where the M5 Touring stands against grand tourers electric

Comparison across 32 grand tourers electric marketed between 2022–2026.

0–100 km/h10e / 32
3,5 s
Min 6,1 s · Bmw i5 eDrive40 TouringMax 2,1 s · Tesla Model S Plaid

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the M5 Touring

Frequently asked questions

BMW M5 Touring: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.