F48 · GENERATION 2018 · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE

X1 xDrive20d

190 hp, 7,8 s 0-100 : among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X1 xDrive20d ranks 7th of 30 in Combined consumption, 7th of 26 in Tank range, 10th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,57715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

190hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.8s

VMax 219 km/h

Cons.

4.8L

/100 km

Tank

51L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X1 xDrive20d

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.8 L/100km
Tank51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,8 s
VMax219 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,439 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,821 mm
Height1,598 mm
Boot505 L
Kerb weight1,615 kg
Cd0.29
CO₂ WLTP126 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 30 C-SUV, the X1 xDrive20d ranks (top 7 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 7th of 30 in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100), 7th of 26 in Tank range (1063 km), 10th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (7.8 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 1419 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.8 L/100 L/100 (7th of 30 in Combined consumption)

The X1 xDrive20d consumes 4.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).

Tank range: 1063 km (7th of 26 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X1 xDrive20d covers 1063 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X1 xDrive20d stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 30 C-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.

Combined consumption7e / 30
4.8 L/100
Min 8.6 L/100 · Cupra Formentor VZMax 4.3 L/100 · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
Tank range7e / 26
1 063 km
Min 765 km · Kia Sportage 1.6 T-GDi 177 4WDMax 1 419 km · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
0–100 km/h10e / 30
7,8 s
Min 11,8 s · Nissan Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 XtronicMax 4,9 s · Cupra Formentor VZ

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X1 F48 range

Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F48

Compare

Popular duels involving the X1 xDrive20d

Frequently asked questions

BMW X1 xDrive20d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the X1 xDrive20d ranks 7th of 30 in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 7th of 26 in Tank range (1063 km, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 10th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (7.8 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).

1063 km on a full tank (4.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 7th of 26 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 4.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 xDrive20d vs Bmw X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.