F48 · GENERATION 2016 · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE

X1 xDrive25d

231 hp, 6,6 s 0-100 : among the 22 C-SUV 2014–2018, the X1 xDrive25d ranks 12th of 22 in Combined consumption, 12th of 20 in Tank range, 1st of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,34215,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

231hp

450 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.6s

VMax 235 km/h

Cons.

5.2L

/100 km

Tank

51L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X1 xDrive25d

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm\u00b3
Power231 hp
Couple450 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5,2 L/100km
Tank51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,6 s
VMax235 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,447 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,821 mm
Height1,598 mm
Boot505 L
Kerb weight1,575 kg
Cd0.29
CO₂ WLTP135 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 22 C-SUV, the X1 xDrive25d ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 1st of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.6 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 1419 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.2 L/100 L/100 (12th of 22 in Combined consumption)

The X1 xDrive25d consumes 5.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).

Tank range: 981 km (12th of 20 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X1 xDrive25d covers 981 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X1 xDrive25d stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 22 C-SUV marketed between 2014–2018.

Combined consumption

12eout of 22

5.2 L/100
Min7.7 L/100 · Jaguar E-PACE P200
Max4.3 L/100 · Bmw X1 xDrive18d

Tank range

12eout of 20

981 km
Min850 km · Bmw X1 sDrive20i
Max1 419 km · Bmw X1 xDrive18d

0–100 km/h

1eout of 22

6,6 s
Min11,8 s · Nissan Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 Xtronic
Max6,6 s · Bmw X1 xDrive25d

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X1 F48 range

Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F48

Compare

Popular duels involving the X1 xDrive25d

Take the next step

Find a X1 xDrive25d or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X1 xDrive25d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X1 xDrive25d rank in its segment?#

Among the 22 C-SUV 2014–2018, the X1 xDrive25d ranks 12th of 22 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 12th of 20 in Tank range (981 km, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 1st of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.6 s, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive25d).

What is the range of the X1 xDrive25d?#

981 km on a full tank (5.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 12th of 20 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the X1 xDrive25d cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X1 xDrive18d instead?#

The Bmw X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 xDrive25d vs Bmw X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.