BMW X1 xDrive25d
231 hp, 6,6 s 0-100 : among the 22 C-SUV 2014–2018, the X1 xDrive25d ranks 12th of 22 in Combined consumption, 12th of 20 in Tank range, 1st of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 231 hp
- 450 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.6 s
- VMax 235 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.2 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,995 cm³
- Power
- 231 hp
- Couple
- 450 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,6 s
- VMax
- 235 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,447 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,670 mm
- Width
- 1,821 mm
- Height
- 1,598 mm
- Boot
- 505 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,575 kg
- Cd
- 0.29
- CO₂ WLTP
- 135 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 C-SUV, the X1 xDrive25d ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 1st of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.6 s).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X1 xDrive18d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X1 xDrive18d (1st with 1419 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.2 L/100 L/100 (12th of 22 in Combined consumption)
The X1 xDrive25d consumes 5.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 981 km (12th of 20 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X1 xDrive25d covers 981 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the X1 xDrive25d stands against C-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X1 F48 range
Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F48
Popular duels involving the X1 xDrive25d
Continue with the BMW X1 xDrive25d
The same car, from other angles.
BMW X1 xDrive25d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the X1 xDrive25d rank in its segment?
Among the 22 C-SUV 2014–2018, the X1 xDrive25d ranks 12th of 22 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100, behind the BMW X1 xDrive18d), 12th of 20 in Tank range (981 km, behind the BMW X1 xDrive18d), 1st of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.6 s, behind the BMW X1 xDrive25d).
What is the range of the X1 xDrive25d?
981 km on a full tank (5.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 12th of 20 in Tank range.
How much does the X1 xDrive25d cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X1 xDrive18d instead?
The BMW X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 xDrive25d vs BMW X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.