G02 · GENERATION 2018 · FAMILY SUV
BMWICE

X4 xDrive25d

231 hp, 6,8 s 0-100 : among the 28 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X4 xDrive25d ranks 5th of 28 in Combined consumption, 5th of 25 in Tank range, 20th of 28 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,87215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

231hp

500 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.8s

VMax 230 km/h

Cons.

5.7L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X4 xDrive25d

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Power231 hp
Couple500 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.7 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,8 s
VMax230 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,752 mm
Wheelbase2,864 mm
Width1,918 mm
Height1,621 mm
Boot525 L
Kerb weight1,755 kg
Cd0.3
CO₂ WLTP149 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 28 D-SUV, the X4 xDrive25d ranks (top 5 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 5th of 28 in Combined consumption (5.7 L/100), 5th of 25 in Tank range (1193 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d (1st with 1214 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.7 L/100 L/100 (5th of 28 in Combined consumption)

The X4 xDrive25d consumes 5.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 1193 km (5th of 25 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X4 xDrive25d covers 1193 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1214 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X4 xDrive25d stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 28 D-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.

Combined consumption5e / 28
5.7 L/100
Min 13 L/100 · Jeep Wrangler RubiconMax 5.1 L/100 · DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8
Tank range5e / 25
1 193 km
Min 604 km · Porsche Macan GTSMax 1 214 km · Bmw X4 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h20e / 28
6,8 s
Min 8,6 s · DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8Max 3,8 s · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X4 G02 range

Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G02

Compare

Popular duels involving the X4 xDrive25d

Frequently asked questions

BMW X4 xDrive25d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 28 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X4 xDrive25d ranks 5th of 28 in Combined consumption (5.7 L/100, behind the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8), 5th of 25 in Tank range (1193 km, behind the Bmw X4 xDrive20d), 20th of 28 in 0–100 km/h (6.8 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).

1193 km on a full tank (5.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 5th of 25 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X4 xDrive25d vs DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.