Among the 19 city cars 2020–2024, the C3 PureTech 110 FWD ranks 7th of 16 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 10th of 19 in 0–100 km/h (10.1 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
Mk3 · GENERATION 2022 → · CITY CAR
CitroenICE
C3 PureTech 110 FWD
110 hp, 10,1 s 0-100 : among the 19 city cars 2020–2024, the C3 PureTech 110 FWD ranks 7th of 16 in Combined consumption, 10th of 19 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
110hp
205 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
10.1s
VMax 189 km/h
Cons.
5.5L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Citroen C3 PureTech 110 FWD
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 110 hp |
| Couple | 205 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.5 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 10,1 s |
| VMax | 189 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,745 mm |
| Height | 1,480 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,055 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 19 city cars, the C3 PureTech 110 FWD ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition (1st with 5.3 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (7th of 16 in Combined consumption)
The C3 PureTech 110 FWD consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the C3 PureTech 110 FWD stands against city cars
Comparison across 19 city cars marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption7e / 16
5.5 L/100
Min 6.6 L/100 · MINI Cooper S FWDMax 5.1 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
0–100 km/h10e / 19
10,1 s
Min 14,0 s · Citroen C3 PureTech 83 FWDMax 5,3 s · Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
208 PureTech 110110 hp · 0-100 10.8 s
A1 allstreet 30 TFSI 85 kW116 hp · 0-100 10.3 s
A1 allstreet 30 TFSI S tronic 85 kW116 hp · 0-100 10.3 s
A1 Sportback 30 TFSI 85 kW116 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Citroen C3 Mk3 range
Generation Mk3 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the Mk3
Compare
Popular duels involving the C3 PureTech 110 FWD
Frequently asked questions
Citroen C3 PureTech 110 FWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the C3 PureTech 110 FWD vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.