Hyundai i20 1.2 MPi
84 hp, 13,1 s 0-100 : among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the i20 1.2 MPi ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 5 in Tank range, 13th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 84 hp
- 118 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 13.1 s
- VMax 173 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 40 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,197 cm³
- Power
- 84 hp
- Couple
- 118 Nm
- Gearbox
- 5 rapports
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 40 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 13,1 s
- VMax
- 173 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,040 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,580 mm
- Width
- 1,775 mm
- Height
- 1,450 mm
- Boot
- 352 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,013 kg
- CO₂ WLTP
- 127 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 city cars, the i20 1.2 MPi ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 (1st with 789 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (6th of 11 in Combined consumption)
The i20 1.2 MPi consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 714 km (3rd of 5 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the i20 1.2 MPi covers 714 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 789 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the i20 1.2 MPi stands against city cars
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Hyundai i20 III range
Generation III launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the III
Popular duels involving the i20 1.2 MPi
Continue with the Hyundai i20 1.2 MPi
The same car, from other angles.
Hyundai i20 1.2 MPi: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the i20 1.2 MPi rank in its segment?
Among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the i20 1.2 MPi ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 3rd of 5 in Tank range (714 km, behind the Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140), 13th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (13.1 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris).
What is the range of the i20 1.2 MPi?
714 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 5 in Tank range.
How much does the i20 1.2 MPi cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG instead?
The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i20 1.2 MPi vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.