III · GENERATION 2020 · CITY CAR
HyundaiICE

i20 1.2 MPi

84 hp, 13,1 s 0-100 : among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the i20 1.2 MPi ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 5 in Tank range, 13th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,69715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

84hp

118 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

13.1s

VMax 173 km/h

Cons.

5.6L

/100 km

Tank

40L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Hyundai i20 1.2 MPi

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,197 cm³
Power84 hp
Couple118 Nm
Gearbox5 rapports
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.6 L/100km
Tank40 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h13,1 s
VMax173 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,040 mm
Wheelbase2,580 mm
Width1,775 mm
Height1,450 mm
Boot352 L
Kerb weight1,013 kg
CO₂ WLTP127 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 14 city cars, the i20 1.2 MPi ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140 (1st with 789 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (6th of 11 in Combined consumption)

The i20 1.2 MPi consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 714 km (3rd of 5 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the i20 1.2 MPi covers 714 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 789 km.

Segment positioning

Where the i20 1.2 MPi stands against city cars

Comparison across 14 city cars marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption6e / 11
5.6 L/100
Min 7.1 L/100 · MINI John Cooper Works FWDMax 5.1 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
Tank range3e / 5
714 km
Min 620 km · MINI John Cooper Works FWDMax 789 km · Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140
0–100 km/h13e / 14
13,1 s
Min 14,0 s · Citroen C3 PureTech 83 FWDMax 5,5 s · Toyota GR Yaris

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Hyundai i20 III range

Generation III launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the III

Compare

Popular duels involving the i20 1.2 MPi

Frequently asked questions

Hyundai i20 1.2 MPi: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the i20 1.2 MPi ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 3rd of 5 in Tank range (714 km, behind the Renault Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140), 13th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (13.1 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris).

714 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 5 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the i20 1.2 MPi vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.