I · GENERATION 2014 · CITY CAR
PeugeotICE

208 PureTech 110

110 hp, 10,8 s 0-100 : among the 7 city cars 2012–2016, the 208 PureTech 110 ranks 4th of 7 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 6 in Tank range, 4th of 7 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,66715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

110hp

205 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

10.8s

VMax 194 km/h

Cons.

5.5L

/100 km

Tank

44L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Peugeot 208 PureTech 110

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture3 cyl.
Displacement1,199 cm³
Power110 hp
Couple205 Nm
GearboxManuelle 5 rapports Manuelle
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.5 L/100km
Tank44 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h10,8 s
VMax194 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length3,973 mm
Width1,739 mm
Height1,460 mm
Kerb weight1,095 kg
Cd0.33
CO₂ WLTP126 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 7 city cars, the 208 PureTech 110 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG (1st with 5.0 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG (1st with 900 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (4th of 7 in Combined consumption)

The 208 PureTech 110 consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG (5.0 L/100).

Tank range: 800 km (3rd of 6 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 208 PureTech 110 covers 800 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 900 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 208 PureTech 110 stands against city cars

Comparison across 7 city cars marketed between 2012–2016.

Combined consumption4e / 7
5.5 L/100
Min 8.7 L/100 · Renault Clio 4 RS Trophy 220Max 5 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG
Tank range3e / 6
800 km
Min 517 km · Renault Clio 4 RS Trophy 220Max 900 km · Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG
0–100 km/h4e / 7
10,8 s
Min 12,4 s · SEAT Ibiza 1.2 TSI 90 7DSGMax 6,5 s · Peugeot 208 GTi 30th 208

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Peugeot 208 I range

Generation I launched in 2012. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the I

Compare

Popular duels involving the 208 PureTech 110

Frequently asked questions

Peugeot 208 PureTech 110: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 7 city cars 2012–2016, the 208 PureTech 110 ranks 4th of 7 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG), 3rd of 6 in Tank range (800 km, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG), 4th of 7 in 0–100 km/h (10.8 s, behind the Peugeot 208 GTi 30th 208).

800 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 6 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 208 PureTech 110 vs Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 90 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.